Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misha Kokaia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. No prejudice against recreating another version of the article with sources. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  17:01, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Misha Kokaia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Delete, absolutely NO sources on this article can be found, plus person is not notable, and article is merely a stub. This is NOT Wikipedia worthy at all. Davidgoodheart (talk) 00:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 04:52, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 04:52, 8 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment Um, are you voting for your own proposal? Trillfendi (talk) 04:59, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I AM voting to have this article deleted, and yes I posted this deletion tag, is that what you meant? Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:04, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * You can’t do both. You propose deletion while others vote.Trillfendi (talk) 05:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * You can't? I know people who have put deletion tags on articles, then nominated them for deletion, this is news to me, where did you get this information from? Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:44, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Since an nomination is automatically considered a !vote for deletion, people don't generally write it as a bold !vote as you have done, but of course one can (and would have to) support deletion when nominating for deletion. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:47, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for clarifying this for me, as you would know this being a Wikipedia administrator, and an authority on this matter and thanks for your quick response as well! Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:55, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * All things considered it’s obviously a delete. No question about that.Trillfendi (talk) 06:13, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * No kidding! All that I meant was what wrong with leaving a sentence like everyone else does, perhaps I didn't word that right. Davidgoodheart (talk) 06:53, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Conventionally, you might start the nominating sentence with "Absolutely no sources" and so on. There is no need for the bullet or bolded vote. Jack N. Stock (talk) 13:49, 8 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:V, WP:OR, WP:N, WP:BLP. I searched using both the English-language name and with the Georgian name (though I do not know the language) and found nothing except mirrors of the WP article. Surely if this person was a notable politician there would be coverage of his disappearance. I could not find an article in the Georgian edition of WP. Jack N. Stock (talk) 05:09, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Surprised at the total absence of sources for this one given the subject matter. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 05:56, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Undersourced and the person fails notability anyway. Sheldybett (talk) 08:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable-- Binod Basnet  (talk)  08:57, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, without prejudice against recreation if somebody can do better than this. The article calls him a politician, but completely fails to contain any content whatsoever about any political roles he might have held, so it's impossible to measure against WP:NPOL at all — so we can only judge this on the disappearance claims themselves, and there's no evidence turning up that he clears WP:GNG for that either. To be fair, if he disappeared in 1993, then potential sources might just not Google well, so I'd be willing to reconsider this if somebody with access to archived Georgian media coverage can improve the article with actual sources — but the lack of an article on the Georgian Wikipedia is not promising. Bearcat (talk) 15:22, 8 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.