Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mishpachah Lev-Tsiyon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 17:34, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Mishpachah Lev-Tsiyon

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Per discussions on the Mishpachah Lev-Tsiyon talk page, the issue has been brought up as to whether or not the subject is notable enough for an article on Wikipedia. Currently, no reliable sources are cited in the article. Of its 35 provided references, 24 are from nccg.org (a website owned by the founder of the religion), 2 by a site critical of the religion, 8 are from groups.mns.com, and 1 is from Geocities. Likewise, two newspapers are mentioned, but only small Swedish newspapers within the sects' vicinity. I recommend a strong delete, unless more reliable resources can be found. In that case, the article can then be recreated and rewritten with these reliable sources as a basis. The subject seems to only be of interest to few people. Drumpler 03:07, 3 October 2007 (UTC) Drumpler 03:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * This should also extend to the pages which redirect to it: New Covenant Church of God (Sweden), Mishpachah lev-tsiyon and New Covenant Ministries. Drumpler 03:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Definately not notable, no sources. Anti  V  Man  04:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above (looks familiar! :p ) No reliable sources, WP:V not met (I've also searched for any, but no good). Similarly, notability is not asserted (again, I've looked elsewhere and can find no evidence of any).  Neil   ム  12:04, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No reliable sources and appears to no be notable in the least. -- En dl ess Dan  13:59, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable. No reliable sources. — DIEGO  talk 05:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Yes I agree. Anyway the article is too screwed up to clean up. Someone should contact the author of the page or something. ~ Milniv ri  ~  06:51, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I already contacted all significant contributors. Drumpler 15:49, 6 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.