Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misinformation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep per WP:HEY, WP:SNOW, WP:N, etc. Bearian (talk) 18:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Misinformation

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Dictionary definition with some WP:OR tossed in. Collectonian (talk) 09:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The current article appears to have been totally rewritten by Uncle G after the nomination, which is why I was mildly perplexed at the cognitive dissonance generated by the apparent discrepancy between what this nomination describes and what I read. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:46, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep with Uncle G's edits into a sourced stub that goes beyond a definition. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Uncle G's rewrite, goes beyond dicdef now to sufficiently establish encyclopedic merit. Perfectly serviceable stub now. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 15:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.