Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Asia Pacific International 2014


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:49, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Miss Asia Pacific International 2014

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:CRYSTALBALL. No WP:RS says when or if this event will be happening. Facebook is the only source for it being in South Korea. The article itself says November 2013! ...William 19:10, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions....William 19:15, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 7 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC)




 * Delete - The title is perhaps a little misleading. When clicking on the listed official web site, this appears to be associated to Miss Asia Pacific World, or at least the company running.  That website calls this Miss Asia Pacific World Super Talent Search in its about page, and goes on to lay claim to "Miss Asia Pacific International" as a brand.  Miss Asia Pacific International apparently went defunct with the cancellation of their 2008 pageant.  Perhaps the brand was bought out by the Pacific World group.  Who knows because I can't any coverage in reliable sources to confirm any of the information in the article. -- Whpq (talk) 21:18, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. If there is a notable subject here, which I doubt at this stage, there's nothing really worth keeping in this article. --Michig (talk) 07:10, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.