Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Chad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 07:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Miss Chad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ORG and has zero sources. Appears to have operated only 3 years, and only sent someone to its parent pageant once. Legacypac (talk) 07:19, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:15, 29 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:18, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  sst ✈  04:04, 5 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Very weak keep The nominator's concerns are well stated, but Chad is a relative newcomer to this competition and collecting sources from Chadian media might be tricky. I am willing to give this puny little article a chance to grow. And Adoil Descended (talk) 13:57, 5 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.