Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Conduct


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was userfied; redirect deleted. Mackensen (talk) 12:46, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Miss Conduct
User:MissConduct created this WP:BIO-failing vanity/spam piece about herself. wikipediatrix 19:50, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  20:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete here so that there will be precedent against recreating article. NawlinWiki 20:29, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy Belongs on her user page, not an article. Resolute 02:57, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Google search "Miss Conduct" bondage returns 18 600 results --Alojz.Novak 15:02, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment That's about 330 distinct hits, not all of which are relevant. Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  15:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep as being notable within her field (fetish and bondage). My search yields 77,500 relevant results, and it should be noted for the umpteenth time that "distinct hits" are complete rubbish; according to Search engine test, Microsoft only returns 552 unique hits, and I highly doubt anyone is going to argue that we're comparing apples and apples here.  RFerreira 19:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.