Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Crash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clpo13(talk) 22:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Miss Crash

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Source searches, including customized searches, are not providing any significant coverage to qualify a standalone article. Only finding passing mentions such as this and this. North America1000 04:09, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:10, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:11, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:22, 11 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Unfortunately, sources that cover the subject in-depth do not seem to exist. She is known in the fetish/performance world but the coverage is generally in the context of a larger story, such as Dave Navarro] being suspended, and the like. ValarianB (talk) 12:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   04:56, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep It doesn't need in-depth coverage, given that it's a niche subject. kencf0618 (talk) 04:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * A novel defense, to be sure. There are these side notability guides in the project, the closest fit for this person would seem to be WP:ENTERTAINER. Can you say how the subject meets that guide, if that is the one you intend to offer as an alternate to WP:N ? ValarianB (talk) 12:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - being a niche subject in no way removes the need to meet WP:GNG and this page plainly fails to meet this guideline. Just Chilling (talk) 13:23, 21 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.