Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss District of Columbia World


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Discounting the blocked sock nom, there's still consensus to delete on lack of sources. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:56, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Miss District of Columbia World

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

local beauty pageant, not notable enough for wikipedia. Fails GNG MistyGraceWhite (talk) 12:20, 11 May 2020 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 19:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

WP:RS and WP:SIGCOV needs to be met. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 12:51, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Article can be fixed with a few edits, thus is not a candidate for AfD. See WP:BEFORE & WP:ATD. IZ041 (talk) 04:20, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * @User:MistyGraceWhite Pageantopolis is a reliable secondary source that can be used. If Pageantopolis is not a reliable source then why is it listed as a useful resource on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants page??????? Here are the sources from Pageantopolis that are used in the article. IZ041 (talk) 18:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Just a simple trivial mention does not make a topic pass GNG. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 20:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:46, 19 May 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 15:09, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting for a third time due to disruption caused by the sockpuppetry.
 * Comment Nom has been blocked as sock, so this can probably be closed as no consensus even if no further comments come in.      StarM 18:39, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG due to a complete lack of sustained WP:SIGCOV of the pageant in independent reliable sources. Of the three sources in the article, two are archived list mentions from a defunct website that appears to have been self-published by a fan of pageants, and the third is a mini-bio in first person tense on the parent pageant's website. I found no other substantial coverage of the pageant itself in a WP:BEFORE search I did, only some local interviews with winners. This local pageant is just not notable. Newshunter12 (talk) 17:39, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG lack of third party verifiable sources.--Richie Campbell (talk) 02:26, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠</b> 03:54, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: as not notable failing WP:GNG per . The sourcing standards for a BLP (or related) article are higher.--  Otr500 (talk) 04:17, 11 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.