Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Earth Lebanon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:57, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Miss Earth Lebanon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced article about a beauty pageant. There are few sources to establish that it even exists, and none that I could find to establish that the pageant is notable. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 17:58, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. - MrX 17:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 23 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Mabalu (talk) 16:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - HOWEVER, as an offshoot of Miss Earth, there is probably an argument for a procedural keep. The Miss Earth pageant is notable and there is precedent for articles on the participating countries. However, the link in Template:MissEarthCountries goes to Miss Lebanon rather than to this page. I see NO mention of Miss Earth, or of Roula Saad, in the Miss Lebanon article, other than an inclusion of the Miss Earth template. Delete vote still stands, but if this is indeed the deciding round for the Miss Earth pageant, rather than Miss Lebanon, then it is probably a valid subject for an article per the precedent set by the template/pageant to have an article for every country's deciding pageant. Mabalu (talk) 09:17, 29 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 08:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NativeForeigner Talk 05:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment Are we going to relist this debate over and over again to perpetuity? Mabalu (talk) 08:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Apparently there are no reliable sources available that establish that this is a notable topic. The only purpose this article would seem to have is purely promotional. Fails WP:GNG.- MrX 12:46, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per MrX - Again no evidence of notability & Seems to fail GNG. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  15:24, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per MrX. Fails WP:GNG. SW3 5DL (talk) 17:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.