Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Global 2014 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No consensus on redirecting, chiefly due to Lemongirl942's argument (K.e.coffman's argument is less persuasive as notability and search term usage are not necessarily related) Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:06, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Miss Global 2014
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The pageant edition has no significant coverage. The winner was already added in the Miss Global wiki article. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:35, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:10, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:10, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Miss Global. North America1000 03:11, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as this is the second attempt at deleting this article. There's nothing to merge to Miss Global as the only source listed is a self-citation, and the name of the winner has already been added to the main article. A redirect is unnecessary since anyone searching for Miss Global 2014 would find the main one. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 17:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, noted the winner is already listed on Miss Global article page; therefore no reason for separate, non-notable stand alone article. Kierzek (talk) 18:03, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Miss Global no notability, but a valid search term. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:18, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I still stand with Delete not Redirect or merge since the winner was already specified in the main article.--Richie Campbell (talk) 02:19, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Right, which is why redirect makes sense. She is in the main article and it's a valid search term. A redirect will help others find the information they are looking for. I agree that a merge is not neccesary. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:17, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I personally find these redirects to be a bit disorienting. Since the subject is non notable, it's unlikely to be a valid search term. I thus believe that deletion is the right approach. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I concur with you, deletion is the correct approach in this matter.--Richie Campbell (talk) 00:36, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I would be fine with deletion, but don't really see how a redirect is disorienting. If someone who isn't a registered user is trying to find out who won in 2014 they could very well search for Miss Global 2014. Redirects are cheap and if it helps someone find what they are looking for, I think its a positive. Like I said, I'm not necessarily opposed to deletion here, I just think there is a reason that a redirect might be helpful, and so we might was well do it now. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:17, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete (no need to merge/redirect). The only important information in the article is the name of the winner (which is entirely sourced to a primary source). There is no content left here to merge. I don't see a need to redirect this as well because the search engines can easily semantically search for "miss global 2014" and go directly to the Miss Global article. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:12, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.