Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Grand International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The consensus is that as this event has not yet taken place, notability cannot be established from the sources provided. Should there be significant coverage during/after the event, the article could be re-created  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 05:41, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Miss Grand International

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't appear notable Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:10, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 4 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - I'm seeing quite a few sources that at least are covering the pageant. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:17, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - Could you share those sources? -- Whpq (talk) 16:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * . Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:28, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Those are helpful. For me, that's not enough to push me over to a keep. -- Whpq (talk) 10:19, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - A pageant in its first year, and which hasn't even been held yet. The only reliable source I can find is this which profiles a contestant, and is very minor coverage to the pint of being a passing mention. -- Whpq (talk) 16:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:19, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:08, 19 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable yet, chances are it probably won't be, but who can tell? Mabalu (talk) 16:11, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.