Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Grand México


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirected to Rostro de México. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 10:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Miss Grand México

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesnt cite any sources FindMeLost (talk) 05:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * keep - Article relates to Miss_Grand_Internacional_2015 in the spanish wikipedia.  This content has references for these contests, but a lot of it is self published.  I found a few news stories in spanish.  Someone just needs to move them over to the English wikipedia who reads spanish. DangerDogWest (talk) 05:45, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America1000 04:02, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    06:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    06:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:29, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:30, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. By which I mean, keep the target article to which the subject article is now a redirect.  I also mean 'keep' the current redirect.  The target article could use some clean-up and some more sourcing, but the most recent years do appear to be sourced.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.