Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Hannah Minx


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Shi meru  06:31, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Miss Hannah Minx

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Rather non-notable Internet celebrity. A 100,000 subscribers is not even close to numbers of most popular YouTube vloggers worldwide. Despite her minor attention in Japan, there are about two or three reliable sources covering this person outside of YouTube. Karppinen (talk) 11:55, 6 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep "Today she is ranked as the most subscribed of all time of the YouTube partnered channels in Japan," a fact which is backed up with probably the most reliable source possible - YouTube itself is certainly notable. No, she's not up there with the elite of video bloggers, but I certainly think being one of the most popular vloggers in Japan is at least slightly notable.  WackyWace  talk to me, people 14:15, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep – Per above, plus the fact that, as mentioned by the nominator, she is mentioned in several reliable resources. Although she isn't mentioned in a thousand (Western) sources, this person is still notable. This wiki is also not "Western-centric"; notability in Japan isn't less important than Western notability. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 15:54, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO due to lack of multiple reliable and independent secondary sources with significant coverage. Youtube? Not independent. College paper and blogs? not reliable. Edison (talk) 20:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not Notable, no independent secondary sources. Heavytundra (talk) 13:37, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a promotion tool. Having 90,000 Youtube subscribers isn't terribly notable in itself, regardless of what country those subscribers come from. Outside sources include a non-notable podcast that talks about Youtube and a local college paper, so not significant sources themselves. 68.97.129.237 (talk) 14:27, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Nowhere near as notable as other youtube celebs with articles. Ryan 4314   (talk) 17:04, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.