Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Independent (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 14:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Miss Independent (album)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No reliable sources quoted in article. Looking for reliable sources outside the article shows none: no announcements from Tisdale, no announcements from Warner. Private press conference is usually a good sign of a fabricated article. Kww (talk) 14:34, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Amend nomination and delete both. I've added the related American Side to the nomination: it's the alleged first single from the album, and the only source cited at the article is a blog. Both articles fail verifiability. —C.Fred (talk) 14:45, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both WP:CRYSTAL. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 15:32, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both: Articles about future albums that has no reliable sources. WP:CRYSTAL. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 16:33, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both: These are articles about a hoax album and a hoax single. There's no references and a tracklist...well, Tisdale didn't finish recording her second album at the moment.Voices4ever talk • 15:02, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both: I couldn't find any reliable sources either. In fact, I couldn't find any mentions of these supposed titles *anywhere* outside WP, once I'd filtered out all the unrelated Kelly Clarkson/Ne-Yo hits. --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 22:47, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both: It's obviously fan-made. Just like what Kurt Shaped Box said, there isn't a reliable source. Probably, a fansite, but, again, it does not have sources. Kikkokalabud (talk) 23:15, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Observation. The original editor of this article has been blocked for creating fake album covers. He's also created fake album articles in the past. This may be blatant enough misinformation that it may fall under speedy criterion G3. —C.Fred (talk) 00:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both. If they cannot be reliably verified then they can't stay. Bill (talk 00:53, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Given that no one else found sources (I did find one Portuguese blog, but it seems to be based on the article, not the other way around), I'll happily designate the article a hoax.Kww (talk) 01:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'd happily endorse speedy deletion on the basis of the article being a complete and utter hoax and a waste of electrons - but I would prefer it if an uninvolved admin were to do the necessary. --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 21:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The involvement issue is why I made the observation and didn't delete the pages outright. —C.Fred (talk) 21:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete both: speculation at best, if not hoaxes. Cliff smith  talk  14:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both A private press conference, you say? Isn't an oxymoron? Anyway these both fail WP:V, WP:HOAX, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:RS and oh so many others. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 16:45, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both I would have to agree with all of the above reasons. Ariel  ♥  Gold  00:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both I am the creator of American Side, Pedrovip, and i say Delete both. We have time for a article when Ashley Tisdale say the title of album, if its real... pVip-My talk page —Preceding undated comment was added at 09:36, 30 September 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.