Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss India Worldwide 1991


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 01:20, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Miss India Worldwide 1991

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

In past Arinkit Das had created several articles with similar contents which was deleted by some or the other admins, recently I nominated Miss India Worldwide 1991 for deletion as it was seems to be a split from Miss India Worldwide even I wanted the contributor to merge the article into the suggested article but the deletion template was reverted by User:Kelapstick without contesting the deletion process but after some time I reverted back for which I was warnedsee here by User:Yunshui for getting blocked. My concern is that if this matter is not interfered this will lead to creation of about 24 articles such as Miss India Worldwide 1990 to Miss Indian Worldwide 2014 and so on.  WOW  Indian   Talk 12:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment I removed a speedy deletion tag because the article was not eligible under A10 (as a copy and paste from Miss India Worldwide), as one article is about the pageant as a whole, and one is about a specific year. If there is an issue with Miss India Worldwide not being a notable contest, I think the deletion discussion should have started there rather than at a specific year. --kelapstick(bainuu) 12:11, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * You are saying the speedy deletion criteria (A10) was not valid, but you could have converted it to most suitable one or informed me about it rather reverting it back.  WOW  Indian   Talk 12:24, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * There was no valid speedy deletion criteria. If there was I would have changed it.--kelapstick(bainuu) 12:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 March 12.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 12:16, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep; Improper nomination, why is this article being nominated? Nominator gave no reasoning for the nomination besides a series of unrelated personal issues that have nothing to do with the article in question. Valoem   talk  20:28, 19 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 15:26, 21 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep "If we keep this article, we'll have many more articles!" Oh, horrors! --BDD (talk) 21:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. BDD (talk) 21:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, slakr  \ talk / 03:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment I personally have no views either way - I try to avoid the beauty pageant stuff, but does the fact that the nominator has gotten themselves blocked permanently have any bearing on their AFD? Mabalu (talk) 08:28, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Sometimes yes, but in this case no. --kelapstick(bainuu) 12:37, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.