Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Intercontinental winners


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 21:05, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Miss Intercontinental winners
AfDs for this topic: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Bundling these very similar pages on same non-notable pageant for deletion. The parent page, Miss Intercontinental is currently up for deletion discussion, and these related pages are essentially offshoots/forms/etc on the same topic. Sourcing is universally primary/nonexistent/non-reliable. The creating editors almost universally seem to be single-purpose accounts (suggesting conflict of interest/promotional edits). On the 1986-92 page we actually see: "These were not extensively publicized, and data and photographs are scarce or not available." (So not notable, even then?) Mabalu (talk) 11:46, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating the following related pages for the reasons above:
 * I'm leaving Miss Intercontinental India and Miss Intercontinental 2014 out of this for now as although they are both pretty bad, they still have a lot more info in them and in 2014's case, tons of (almost all worthless) cites and references so seeing how this goes for now - they may merit individual discussion in a way that the above bundled articles don't seem to do. Mabalu (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm leaving Miss Intercontinental India and Miss Intercontinental 2014 out of this for now as although they are both pretty bad, they still have a lot more info in them and in 2014's case, tons of (almost all worthless) cites and references so seeing how this goes for now - they may merit individual discussion in a way that the above bundled articles don't seem to do. Mabalu (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm leaving Miss Intercontinental India and Miss Intercontinental 2014 out of this for now as although they are both pretty bad, they still have a lot more info in them and in 2014's case, tons of (almost all worthless) cites and references so seeing how this goes for now - they may merit individual discussion in a way that the above bundled articles don't seem to do. Mabalu (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm leaving Miss Intercontinental India and Miss Intercontinental 2014 out of this for now as although they are both pretty bad, they still have a lot more info in them and in 2014's case, tons of (almost all worthless) cites and references so seeing how this goes for now - they may merit individual discussion in a way that the above bundled articles don't seem to do. Mabalu (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm leaving Miss Intercontinental India and Miss Intercontinental 2014 out of this for now as although they are both pretty bad, they still have a lot more info in them and in 2014's case, tons of (almost all worthless) cites and references so seeing how this goes for now - they may merit individual discussion in a way that the above bundled articles don't seem to do. Mabalu (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm leaving Miss Intercontinental India and Miss Intercontinental 2014 out of this for now as although they are both pretty bad, they still have a lot more info in them and in 2014's case, tons of (almost all worthless) cites and references so seeing how this goes for now - they may merit individual discussion in a way that the above bundled articles don't seem to do. Mabalu (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm leaving Miss Intercontinental India and Miss Intercontinental 2014 out of this for now as although they are both pretty bad, they still have a lot more info in them and in 2014's case, tons of (almost all worthless) cites and references so seeing how this goes for now - they may merit individual discussion in a way that the above bundled articles don't seem to do. Mabalu (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm leaving Miss Intercontinental India and Miss Intercontinental 2014 out of this for now as although they are both pretty bad, they still have a lot more info in them and in 2014's case, tons of (almost all worthless) cites and references so seeing how this goes for now - they may merit individual discussion in a way that the above bundled articles don't seem to do. Mabalu (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm leaving Miss Intercontinental India and Miss Intercontinental 2014 out of this for now as although they are both pretty bad, they still have a lot more info in them and in 2014's case, tons of (almost all worthless) cites and references so seeing how this goes for now - they may merit individual discussion in a way that the above bundled articles don't seem to do. Mabalu (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm leaving Miss Intercontinental India and Miss Intercontinental 2014 out of this for now as although they are both pretty bad, they still have a lot more info in them and in 2014's case, tons of (almost all worthless) cites and references so seeing how this goes for now - they may merit individual discussion in a way that the above bundled articles don't seem to do. Mabalu (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm leaving Miss Intercontinental India and Miss Intercontinental 2014 out of this for now as although they are both pretty bad, they still have a lot more info in them and in 2014's case, tons of (almost all worthless) cites and references so seeing how this goes for now - they may merit individual discussion in a way that the above bundled articles don't seem to do. Mabalu (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm leaving Miss Intercontinental India and Miss Intercontinental 2014 out of this for now as although they are both pretty bad, they still have a lot more info in them and in 2014's case, tons of (almost all worthless) cites and references so seeing how this goes for now - they may merit individual discussion in a way that the above bundled articles don't seem to do. Mabalu (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm leaving Miss Intercontinental India and Miss Intercontinental 2014 out of this for now as although they are both pretty bad, they still have a lot more info in them and in 2014's case, tons of (almost all worthless) cites and references so seeing how this goes for now - they may merit individual discussion in a way that the above bundled articles don't seem to do. Mabalu (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm leaving Miss Intercontinental India and Miss Intercontinental 2014 out of this for now as although they are both pretty bad, they still have a lot more info in them and in 2014's case, tons of (almost all worthless) cites and references so seeing how this goes for now - they may merit individual discussion in a way that the above bundled articles don't seem to do. Mabalu (talk) 12:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete All as unsupported by reliable sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:07, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Articles for deletion/Miss Intercontinental has just been brought to my notice and shows that the mother article for these articles was pretty categorically deleted (a snow delete, even) in the past. Mabalu (talk) 16:48, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Just to note that the recent AFD for Miss Intercontinental was closed as delete. Mabalu (talk) 22:11, 12 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 10:35, 13 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.