Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Mongolia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) JAaron95  Talk  13:02, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Miss Mongolia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced, non-notable pageant fails WP:NEVENTS and WP:GNG Flat Out (talk) 04:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - national pageant, winner goes to Miss Universe etc. No doubt it receives sufficient coverage in Mongolia. —Мандичка YO 😜 05:39, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Wikimandia can you provide any reliable sources to support notability?.There are none at the moment. Flat Out (talk) 13:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mongolia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 7 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - national final for worlds biggest beauty pageant. per WP:GNG--BabbaQ (talk) 20:33, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - to pass WP:GNG it would need to be sourced. If you are going to apply notability criteria you first need a source. Flat Out (talk) 00:06, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as non notable pageant and as beautifully demonstrated above fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:53, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * You have no case as it doesnt fail GNG. Simply because you write that doesnt mean it trumps facts. --BabbaQ (talk) 11:37, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * That is quite literally the most absurd statement anyone has ever made on here!, I really cannot understand that logic at all! But anyway I have searched on Google and High Beam and found nothing so therefore it fails GNG, The onus is on you to find sources and to add them considering you're !voting to Keep but you both haven't provided one single source .... I wonder why ? ... Maybe because it fails GNG?!. – Davey 2010 Talk 14:35, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * well said Davey2010, how someone can claim WP:GNG on a poorly sourced article without actually citing sources is making a mockery of the AfD process. LibStar (talk) 15:12, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Says the user that uses this AfD as his personal litter box. Talk about mockery of the AfD process Libstar.. own goals are always welcomed.Now please drop the stick...... And Davey, your delete reasonings are absurd. And factory produced it seems, they are copy-paste right. I am done with both of you. Play...--BabbaQ (talk) 15:16, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Instead of arguing with everyone why don't you find sources ? ... Oh wait you can't because there is none!, Throwing your dolls out of the pram does you no favours you know..... – Davey 2010 Talk 15:26, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

quite simple, you can't argue WP:GNG and show no evidence of sources. WP:MUSTBESOURCES. You know how WP works, you are not a new user so just saying WP:GNG is met isn't good enough. 3 users: Davey, flat out and myself have pointed this out to you but you stubbornly refuse to listen. LibStar (talk) 15:29, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * delete keep agree with Davey2010. Onus is on keep !voters to demonstrate coverage to meet WP:GNG which they haven't done. There is no inherent notability of national fashion pageants. LibStar (talk) 14:58, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * in light of Cavarrone's genuine attempt to establish existence of sources, I am changing to keep. LibStar (talk) 00:31, 9 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep obviously notable contest, regularly well covered in native-language mainstream news organs, eg., , , , , , , , , , , , , , ... there are just several thousand of available sources to check out there for anyone who care of searching news about something Mongolian under its Mongolian name. Cavarrone  22:32, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.