Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss National Sweetheart 2013


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:49, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Miss National Sweetheart 2013

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per Articles for deletion/National Sweetheart MT TrainDiscuss 05:36, 23 January 2018 (UTC) Also related: Articles for deletion/National Sweetheart, Articles for deletion/Miss National Sweetheart 2012 and Articles for deletion/Miss National Sweetheart 2011 —MT TrainDiscuss 10:36, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 00:15, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. No significant coverage in multiple reliable sources for a stand alone article. The winner was already listed in the main article, National Sweetheart.--Richie Campbell (talk) 16:13, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete all annual articles; fancraft & trivia -- WP:SIGCOV not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete the notability of the pageant is questionable enough, the yearly incarnations of it clearly are not notable enough to justify articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.