Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Nepal 2002


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Redirect based on the precendent set at Articles for deletion/Miss Nepal 2003 & Articles for deletion/Miss Nepal 2005...it'll be a soft redirect so that any future merging can access the content. &mdash; Scientizzle 18:56, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Miss Nepal 2002

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Content of this article is irrelevant to the subject. It talks about the winner instead of the competition. Not a single line talks about Miss Nepal 2002(the event). Apart from that, it looks like copyright violation from some online newspaper. Seeing the previous track record of the creator who has been introducing copyrighted materials on regular basis, I doubt it is copied and pasted from http://www.nepalnews.com.np/contents/englishdaily/trn/2002/dec/dec08/index.htm. Hitro 14:53, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * As with the other Miss Nepal year articles, merge to Miss Nepal. As for talking about the winner... it should talk about the winner in any case. It shouldn't just talk about the winner... Did you read the article? It does talk about other things. 70.55.200.131 (talk) 12:46, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * see Articles for deletion/Log/2008 October 14 70.55.200.131 (talk) 12:52, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, it talks about when and where the winner born, what is her weight and height. But there is no information about where and when this event took place. Please clarify, what do you want me to see in the AfD Logs. I don't think consensus has reached on any discussion at the moment. Hitro  15:27, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

That is not solely about the winner. You didn't read the article, did you? 70.55.200.131 (talk) 09:50, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, so this is what you were disputing over. With your point above, You clearly mean that rest of the article is worthless and irrelevant to the subject, don't you? FYI, I am not against your vote of merger or redirection. Hitro  13:28, 19 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 16:37, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Content itself need re-written, but that is an editing issue. The subject matter itself is notable and the article is worth keeping.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree that this is an edit issue. --Quartermaster (talk) 16:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions.   -- raven1977 (talk) 20:53, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Miss Nepal: Two similar AfDs have already completed a few days ago on Miss Nepal 2003 and Miss Nepal 2005, both of which resulted in redirects to the main article. The answer should be the same for this article, which is about little more than the winner.  I'm familiar with the article creator's track record, and unfortunately, this looks to me like a roundabout way of creating an article on one of his admired winners.  The information on that year's event could easily be summarised and placed into the main article, just like all of the other years.  If you take out all of the biography details not related to the event, you would be left with little more than a stub.  Why create a stub for every year for a (relatively) small competition when the main article does/will do the job just fine.   Maedin \talk 06:59, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.