Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss South Carolina World


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Black Kite (talk) 22:54, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Miss South Carolina World

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable pageant. Fails GNG MistyGraceWhite (talk) 19:11, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:03, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:03, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:11, 10 May 2020 (UTC)


 * And where in the article does it not meet GNG standards. I can update the article so it includes these requirements. IZ041 (talk) 01:49, 11 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Article can be fixed with a few edits, thus is not a candidate for AfD. See WP:BEFORE & WP:ATD. IZ041 (talk) 04:02, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * @User:IZ041 if it can be fixed, then show us some significant, indepth coverage, in reliable sources. WP:RS and WP:SIGCOV needs to be met. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 12:59, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * @User:MistyGraceWhite Pageantopolis is a reliable secondary source that can be used. If Pageantopolis is not a reliable source then why is it listed as a useful resource on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants page??????? Here are the sources from Pageantopolis that are used in the article. IZ041 (talk) 18:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)


 * @User:IZ041 in-depth coverage is needed. Just a simple trivial mention does not make a topic pass GNG. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 20:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.