Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Texas World (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to United States representatives at Miss World.  Sandstein  14:00, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Miss Texas World
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Was soft deleted at Articles for deletion/Miss Texas World due to no participation in May 2020. Was then restored by request; however the editor that requested it to be restored has not improved it (all five sources are still primary or non-RS ones) therefore bringing it to AfD again. Black Kite (talk) 17:16, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:26, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:26, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:26, 8 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: Of the five sources you're referring to only two of them are primary. The other three are actually secondary.   I also added about 19 other secondary sources to the article in an effort to further improve it show that it can be in the article space. IZ041 (talk) 21:03, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, I meant to say "reliable" rather than primary. So basically, two are primary, two are to a beauty pageant fanpage that is now defunct, and the fifth is a YouTube beauty pageant vlog.  In other words, there are still no reliable sources (I have modified the nomination statement). So, again, why should this be kept? Black Kite (talk) 21:58, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Like I mentioned at the end of my original comment I had added 19 other sources to the article in an effort to further improve it. IZ041 (talk) 1:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:59, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:59, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Worth having one more round of this

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  17:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete redirect to United States representatives at Miss World. The added references are all to a relative thimbleful of local news coverage. The Victoria Advocate and the Paris News are cited four times each both the Del Rio News Herald and the Seguin Gazette-Enterprise are cited twice, making the assertion of "19 other sources" over-inflated.  These are tiny purely local sources and their coverage counts for little significance.  Sources demonstrate either significant coverage in non-reliable sources of reliable source coverage of little significance.  Our basic standard remains unsatisfied. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:48, 3 October 2020 (UTC) !vote changed after finding suitable redirect target per WP:ATD. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 03:03, 3 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.