Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Tiger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:54, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Miss Tiger

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS to support notability. Appears to fail WP:BIO, WP:CREATIVE, and others  ttonyb (talk) 19:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 02:16, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per nom. THF (talk) 02:46, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Just blogs and blurbs. --Bejnar (talk) 05:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Poetic entry, but little of note. In particular, this is another article that wants us to believe that getting WP:PUFF awards of the type "X under X" (in this case, "30 under 30" from an LGBT-oriented website) equate to notability – they do not. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 20:11, 24 February 2010 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.