Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Tourism International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. After being relisted twice there is no consensus to delete (non-admin closure)  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:43, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Miss Tourism International

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG as most google hits are related websites or social media; or refer to the individual participants/local versions. The Banner talk 13:17, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - No evidence of any notability, Only crap I've found are all FB/Twitter related. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  17:15, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Well surprisingly there is evidence after all, Anyway per Northamerica1000 passes GNG. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  17:49, 2 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Passes WP:GNG. Source examples include:
 * New Straits Times
 * The Observer
 * Daily Monitor
 * Daily News
 * The Organization of Asia-Pacific News Agencies
 * - News search on Google has many articles from reliable sources reporting about winners
 * – NorthAmerica1000 17:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I guess this is all you could find? Just because the articles in de Daily Monitor and The Observer are about a local version, not the international pageant. The Banner talk 09:51, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 05:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:59, 17 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.