Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Tourism International 2015


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:50, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Miss Tourism International 2015

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Remake of an earlier removed article (reason G5, 8 April 2015). Crystal boll with hardly content en source with related sources, not WP:RS The Banner talk 07:44, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - if the Miss Tourism International pageant is notable enough to have its own article, then the article for this year's event should qualify. From what I've noticed these pageant articles are updated beforehand with all the qualifiers as they win their national spot. See Miss World 2015. —Мандичка YO 😜 08:44, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 16 May 2015 (UTC)


 * {|cellpadding=0 style="border: 1px solid #A3A3A3; background-color: #FFFFFF" align=left width=auto


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. North America1000 13:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * }
 * Draftify until the event starts receiving significant coverage. This will be eventually notable and deserving of a article, but not for a few months until the contest is about to occur. Winner 42 Talk to me!  16:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the parent article until sources meeting the general notability guideline are present. --j⚛e deckertalk 15:18, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - there hardly seems to be any reliable sources with which anyone could create a page. GNews barely turns up any mentions. I don't think a redirect is necessary here. mikeman67 (talk) 15:31, 9 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.