Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Tourism International 2015 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 12:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Miss Tourism International 2015
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article, relying exclusively on primary and affiliated sources with no evidence of any reliable source coverage shown, about the most recent iteration of a lower-tier beauty pageant — and in addition, the article was recently overwritten with a commentary insisting that for some unspecified reason it got cancelled and didn't actually happen at all. If that's true, then it definitely needs to be deleted. And even if it's not, then it still needs to be deleted if it can't be properly sourced. Bearcat (talk) 03:52, 27 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete this organization is not notable, I've looked at this before. Legacypac (talk) 07:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep – The subject meets WP:GNG, although on the slightly weaker side. Source examples include, but are not limited to:, , , , , . North America1000 04:01, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. the actual sources seem to be   PR coverage of a PR project.  I wonder even about the justification of the main article on the series of competitions.  DGG ( talk ) 05:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I also was somewhat neutral about the article but I believe it's simply not overwhelmingly convincing enough and also for its applicable notability, delete at best. SwisterTwister   talk  05:22, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Reads as promo for a minor pageant. Interesting too is that on Miss Tourism International it is claimed that the pageant was postponed. The Banner talk 10:43, 4 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.