Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss USA 2017


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss USA. If any editor thinks this close is inappropriate, please feel free to revert, no need to consult me. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 17:37, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Miss USA 2017

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:CRYSTAL The Banner talk 21:53, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 22:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 22:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Speedy keep WP:NPASR Unscintillating (talk) 06:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:51, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Miss USA Let's use some common sense here; yes, it's WP:TOOSOON for the 2017 article, but redirects are cheap and this can be done until we have details about the 2017 show. Stop creating pointless AfD's that are easily resolved with other means.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:56, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It is not a pointless AfD. When it would really work to create a redirect I would have done it. Unfortunately, my experience tells me that a redirect will be undone at least ten times, so you need something stronger to build on. The Banner talk 08:39, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Then we have semi-protection and it can be patrolled and monitored by interested editors.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 19:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * And it will still be repeatedly recreated... Example: Miss Universe 2016. The Banner talk 20:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment One major editor, a comma-tweaker, and a bot have edited the page besides you in its one-week existence; there is nothing suggesting right now this would be re-created. I have added this page to my watchlist; if any issues occur I'll see them and sort them out and if protection is needed, so be it. Again, these AfD's are nothing but time-wasters when we have other means of maintenance until a sourced article can be made.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 03:08, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Exhibit One in why if this article isn't deleted and SALTED it is likely to be recreated soon after AFD- Miss World 2016 a pageant article that's been recreated (It was also reposted under other names) more than 4 times since its AFD....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is CRYSTAL and redirects do get undone too easily. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:10, 23 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Miss USA as a valid search term. If the redirect were to be undone, then a request for page protection can be made. North America1000 00:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:TOOSOON, follows same example of "Untitled eighth generation Forumla One game" - WP:CRYSTAL and WP:TOOSOON. If there was more evidence then I would consider a redirect but for now, it's a delete decision. Hx7 13:27, 24 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.