Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss World Malaysia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Malaysia. Deor (talk) 18:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Miss World Malaysia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced contentfork of Miss Malaysia. The Banner talk 11:39, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:43, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:43, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:43, 22 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep It's notable -- for example, see Meet the 20 Beautiful and Brilliant Women of Miss Malaysia World 2016. Andrew D. (talk) 18:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete see Daily Mail, the source given above is hardly RS (i.e. it's a redtop tabloid-style website) and the subject is entirely non-notable. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:37, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Redirect. As mentioned above Daily Mail is not a reliable source. This subject fails WP:GNG without any independent reliable sources to validate notability. ERK  talk 10:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I'll buy that this is a valid search term, so I've changed my !vote to redirect per Melanie. No need to merge since there's nothing significantly different that's reliable on the existing page. ERK  talk 12:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * How about a redirect to Miss Malaysia ? --MelanieN (talk) 01:11, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Melanie, as a valid search term. ansh 666 02:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge content into Miss Malaysia. As is stands it is a low encyclopedic value list low notability people.  Aoziwe (talk) 12:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.