Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MissbrauchsOpfer Gegen InternetSperren


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 02:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

MissbrauchsOpfer Gegen InternetSperren

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not meet the notability requirements of the project for organizations due to Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). The organization is not really relevant in German and was deleted there so why should it be in the english Wikipedia? Tzzzzz (talk) 17:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep This project is not the German Wikipedia. We have different guidelines and policies to apply and things that are not notable enough for inclusion in the German Wikipedia can and are included on this project. If you claim that it does not meet Notability (organizations and companies), please use an argument that does not consist of either "not notable for de.wikipedia" or "just not notable". The article lists half a dozen sources explicitly talking about the subject and crediting them with having a major impact on the movement against internet censorship in Germany, which imho meets the requirement of our notability guidelines. And of course the aforementioned deletion on de.wikipedia added quite a bit of coverage that also referenced the subject multiple times. Regards  So Why  19:27, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per above.-- Pookeo9 Say What you Want  20:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per above. Judging from the references, there is also sufficient national media coverage. De728631 (talk) 20:37, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes WP:ORG. Joe Chill (talk) 22:53, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article had sufficient media coverage before it was deleted on German wiki and created more after it was deleted (interesting precendent, BTW). Another issue is more important - no decision on other wiki should be treated as a guide for en.wiki. Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.