Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Missing Pieces (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Incubate to Article Incubator/Missing Pieces (film). v/r - TP 02:28, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Missing Pieces (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unreleased film that does not meet the Wikipedia criteria for motion picture articles. Wefihe (talk) 19:33, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: film looks notable and is IMDb sourced. Alex discussion ★ 23:48, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Incubate as potentially unnoticed film, yet. Only two sources: IMDb, which is not considered as reliable, potentially non-prominent Donnybrook Writing Academy and the main source — official site. I concur with User:MichaelQSchmidt's comments below. Alex discussion ★ 12:55, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Incubate for a short while. Before anyone tells User:Aleksa Lukic that "looks notable" is not a valid keep reason, or reminds that Wikipedia does not consider IMDB a reliable source for notability... let's take a look at what's otherwise so far available on this film: for example, Independent Film Critic has reviewed a screener copy. So has Get the Big Picture  Nutshell Reviews After the Rest  Cine Talk  Criticize This!  ExclaimFlickering Myth  Flick Feast  Lost in Reviews  Magic City Post  Son: sation  Spl!ng  Screen Spotlight  Sonic Cinema and more.  What? No review from The New York Times? Nope. Not yet.  My thought here, is that while this film has not yet caught the eye of the sources we prefer, it IS getting a lot of pre-release attention.  Incubating this until it is released and does have the coverage we prefer is a decent option that takes it out of article space and places it where it may receive the benefit of colaborative editing until ready to come back.  IMHO.   Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:20, 3 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 23:17, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   05:52, 9 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.