Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Missing inch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:45, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Missing inch
I tried to find references for this article, and came up empty. And it has been sitting with "no ref" for a while now. I suspect it might be made up. Algr 22:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, if any manufacturers are advertising this they should be mentioned at action safe. Gazpacho 23:26, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete —  Um, I could find zero non-wikipedia references to this. 258 google hits, 377 MSN hits and 320 Ask.com hits reveal no infomation as to sources for this article. Fails WP:V —— Eagle (ask me for help) 00:17, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to ???. There's another more common term for this.  What is it?  Gah!  (Bangs head on table).  Might be more Wiktionary material anyway. - Richfife 00:43, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * A fair approximation be "underscan", or "less overscan". But the main assertion is that someone used this in their marketing, and I don't see that. 17.255.241.102 01:43, 3 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Coment If a proper redirect can be found... that would be the best thing to do with this article. But, we might want to find some WP:V first. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 01:35, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The google hits don't back up the Marketing assertation and it seems that the relevant information is covered in the overscan article. Agne 02:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This advertising referred to is very old and extremely irrelevant. 217.162.118.129


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.