Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mission Hockey Skates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP and rename to Mission Hockey. Owen&times; &#9742;  03:26, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

Mission Hockey Skates
This article is in violation of WP:VAIN (commercial). D-Rock 01:33, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, 2,430 google hits, it's a review, not a commercial. AFD is not cleanup. Kappa 03:50, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * It's borderline. Weak keep, cleanup and especially un-POV. NSLE  ( 讨论 + extra ) 04:16, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, would take a lot of work to make it worth keeping; at the moment it's nothing more than glorification of the company and their product. Peyna 06:04, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Was originally going to vote to weak delete but the number of google hits made me go rewrite and NPOV a lot of it. It's a stub, but it's probably worth expanding. Janet13 06:17, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Rename to Mission Hockey and expand to include the company beyond its skates. - Le Scoopertemp [  tk  ] 07:49, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * That's a good suggestion. I like it. D-Rock 08:06, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Does Mission Hockey meet WP:CORP? --  Dalbury ( Talk )  00:23, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Move per Le Scoopertemp. Good idea. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 17:09, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or Rename as said above. I've heard of them myself and played in games where they have been used. Croat Canuck 05:04, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Peyna. Stifle 00:12, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * If Mission Hockey meets WP:CORP, Move per User:Scoops, else Delete. --  Dalbury ( Talk )  00:23, 29 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.