Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Missionary Diocese of Australia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 18:53, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Missionary Diocese of Australia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

the topic is not notable, a WP:BEFORE checked yield no usable references. Wayne Jayes (talk) 17:15, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  18:03, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, no coverage in independent sources whatsoever. Jinkinson   talk to me  18:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak keep -- Assuming good faith, the contnet should be verifiable, even if not verified. Efferctively this is a small denomination in Australia.  It claims to have several parishes.  In US the denomination has 10,000 adherents: small but not insignificant.  It is clearly not a matter of self-appointed titles.  Unfortunately, we do not know how large it si in Australia.   Peterkingiron (talk) 18:38, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:V.  Even if the topic is notable, and there seemed to be some coverage in Gbooks, without any inline citations, the article requires a complete rewrite.  There is also BLP material that lacks inline citations that needs to be removed.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:36, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete, I figure there's room for some detail on the organisation of the denomination somewhere, but WP:V is a problem and having such detail on the organisation of a small schismatic church is probably WP:UNDUE as well. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:51, 15 September 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.