Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Missionary Flights International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Black Kite (t) (c) 19:16, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Missionary Flights International

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable charity Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  05:01, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I see extensive Google News coverage going back nearly 20 years, though unfortunately most of it is hidden behind pay walls. I see many references in Google Books.  Just why, exactly, does the nominator consider  this organization to be non-notable? Cullen328 (talk) 05:11, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Google News Archive shows 269 results. They appear to be notable in having multiple independent and reliable sources with significant coverage of their flying goods and emergency workers to disaster zones as well as regular relief flights to areas in great need like Haiti. I added an article from MSNBC from 2010. There has been significant coverage whenever they flew relief supplies after earthquakes in Haiti, or after Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast of the US. The articles being pay per view just means that someone needs to work through a college or large public library to get access and extend and improve the article. There has been coverage by National Public Radio and other national media for many years. Some "free" articles:, , , , , . Edison (talk) 18:13, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 19:34, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 19:34, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep -- a small airline, but operating since 1964, quiter enough to keep. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.