Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mister Gay Sweden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 02:22, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Mister Gay Sweden

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable beauty pageant not covered in reliable sources ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 16:33, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --PEAR (talk) 18:30, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's difficult to judge the notability of this topic without knowing Swedish. I suggest tagging the article and giving editors with specialized knowledge an opportunity to find references. Otherwise, we risk deleting the article because it represents a minority interest or is covered mainly in foreign-language sources. Valerius 02:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Nobody's saying "delete and salt." The stub article doesn't cite any sources, and no one has been able to find any.  If someone can find sources they can use that to write a proper article. ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 13:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Aarktica 14:11, 11 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Navou banter 22:15, 11 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - If the page exists in the Swedish wikipedia I will change my view to keep. That to me will establish that it is important beyond reasonable doubt.  Otherwise, we ran the peril of having a hoax article, being used for promotion, etc. Brusegadi 02:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge with the related Gay Euro contests. The contest system holds little interest outside the gay male world but that's hardly reason for deletion. Benjiboi 20:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete in the absence of more reliable sources. I concur about the concerns raised by Brusegadi. JCO312 19:23, 16 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.