Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mister Supranational India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Mister Supranational India
AfDs for this article: 


 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable pageant for men. No in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources. The article was previously deleted at AfD as Mister Supranational and Mister Supranational 2016 (the male counterpart to equally non-notable Miss Supranational, an article that has been deleted multiple times, and recreated almost as many times). Fails WP:EVENT and general notability guideline. GSS (talk |c|em ) 03:22, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 03:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 03:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 03:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 03:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Noting that I declined a speedy G4 on this because it wasn't on the same topic as the previous AfD'd articles - but that probably supports the deletion further since it's on a subtopic of a subject that has recently been deemed not notable. ansh 666 05:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. I don't see how this could be encyclopedic. Fails WP:LASTING, WP:GEOSCOPE, WP:COVERAGE, WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE, and WP:DIVERSE. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 07:05, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are two sources provided, one of which is an external link to the organization's site and another one highlights the victory of the candidate who was sent to represent the nation to the pageant. This article is not about the so-called International Pageant Mister Supranational and is all about the Indian representatives to the international pageant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helper V1 (talk • contribs) 04:52, 22 October 2017 (UTC)  — Note to closing admin: Helper V1 (talk • contribs)  is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.
 * Delete The article failed notability requirement.-Richie Campbell (talk) 02:37, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep The article needs more references but is notable enough. If country like USA can have trivial beauty pageant pages like National Sweetheart and Miss Exotic World Pageant so I see no problem with the notability of the page. Besides the reference provided is from a reputed national newspaper.JayB91 (talk) 20:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument in a deletion debate so can you please demonstrate how it actually meets notability requirements mentioned by above and also if it need more references why not to cite it? Thank you. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 03:34, 27 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment. The event is much notable over the nation all after the recent winning of Srinidhi Ramesh Shetty who won the title Miss Supranational 2016 is from India and also there is India's representative bagged 2nd runner-up at Mister Supranataional 2016.--Helper V1 (talk) 14:38, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I changed your second Keep to Comment, you can't !vote more than once. As I said above every article on wikipedia must meet certain requirements, these include verifiablity, and notability. Please only continue to comment here if you have something new to say. Thank you – GSS (talk |c|em ) 15:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete-Does not have any encyclopedic value. The pageant itself has been around only a few years WP:LASTING and is WP:TOSOON.  FITINDIA   16:32, 27 October 2017 (UTC)


 * I suggest deleting this article even though I'm saying upfront, loud and clear that I did not and will not check its notability. This is why. Since the root article has been deleted I believe that, from a perspective of information organization, it is wrong to spin off a subsidiary article such as the discussion per geography or year, regardless of notability. Now the root has been deleted after an AfD. This AfD can be right or wrong, but even if the latter would be the case, problems should be addressed head on. Right now the root AfD should be viewed as the "law of the land". Translated to WP jargon and linking to the relevant articles, since no justification for WP:SPINOFF this article should be viewed as an unjustified WP:CFORK, regardless of WP:N. gidonb (talk) 01:59, 30 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: Please note that the creator of this article have been blocked from editing for advertising only, likely undeclared paid COI and likely sockpuppet of Sky Groove, repeatedly recreating deleted articles from the sock farm. GSS (talk |c|em ) 02:42, 30 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.