Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mister World (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 13:49, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Mister World
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

This event doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines. No references have been added. Doesn't appear to have received significant coverage from reliable sources. JRheic (talk) 00:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:25, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 18 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:23, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Weak Delete Some coverage, but it's lacking. Previous nomination of the article bring up this coverage from China about the 2010 ceremony there.  There is also coverage of the most recent 2010 Irish winner by...you guessed it-- an Irish national newspaper.  But it's more about the winner than about the award itself.  The coverage here just isn't really substantial. I Jethrobot (talk) 04:53, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: Google News produces the necessary coverage, including an article that claims the 2007 broadcast was watched by 1.4 billion people. Seems notable to me.    Mbinebri   talk &larr; 18:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm very skeptical of that claim -- twice as many people as the FIFA World Cup Final? And was this program even broadcast in the United States, the third-most populous country? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:00, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MacMedtalk stalk 02:12, 1 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm also skeptical of that claim. I don't know what Wikipedia policy is on this but I think it would be unwise to use Chinese state media as if it were a reliable source. - JRheic (talk) 15:44, 1 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Sources that would clearly establish notability have not been provided yet. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:42, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.