Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitchell Dong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus  DGG ( talk ) 03:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Mitchell Dong

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of any significant notability. Most refs are simple name checks. Another is an article written by the subject, another is a swathe of quotes from college alumni. Nothing stacks up to WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 16:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: subject has garnered quite some media attention over the years, but it takes a lot of WP:SYN to construct a biography from that. No secondary sources found that cover the subject in-depth. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 16:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 03:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    10:49, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    10:49, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - I agree, News, Books, browser, Highbeam and Newspapers Archive all easily found several links but perhaps not enough for a better article yet. Notifying tagger . SwisterTwister   talk  05:50, 18 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete because the only real links I could find were this and this. I added the reference tag because I thought there were more... Obviously not.  Ana  r  chyte   10:14, 18 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.