Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitchell Elshot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 22:38, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Mitchell Elshot

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Barely passes WP:NFOOTY, sources aren't great and I can't find any WP:GNG-qualifying coverage on him. SportingFlyer  T · C  15:45, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer  T · C  15:45, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer  T · C  15:45, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer  T · C  15:45, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:00, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:06, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, played a couple of games when he was a youth player. Since retired. Does not meet GNG.--Mvqr (talk) 13:00, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - almost zero coverage outside of football database websites. The best that I could find was this announcement, which is nowhere near enough. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:04, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. He was a bencher and soon called it quits. That's what created exceptionally little interest for someone who technically passes WP:NFOOTY. gidonb (talk) 13:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep seems to pass GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per NFOOTY. KingSkyLord (talk &#124; contribs) 03:45, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:44, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. NFOOTY does not establish notability and is ultimately dependent on GNG. Since there is zero evidence he passes GNG, the article should be deleted. JoelleJay (talk) 04:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. As NFOOTY does not establish notability and is ultimately dependent on GNG. Hence, he doesn't passes GNG. Hypogaearoots (talk) 08:17, 16 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.