Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitchell Gaulton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. J.delanoy gabs adds 00:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Mitchell Gaulton

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable junior league hockey player; fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:HOCKEY's project notability guidelines as not only not having played in a "fully professional" league, his odds of doing so aren't good. Article erroneously asserts that he plays for the New York Rangers, when in fact he's an oft-injured reserve defenseman who has yet to play for his junior team this season. Prod removed by article creator without comment.  RGTraynor  04:08, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hockey-related deletion discussions.   RGTraynor  04:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO, WP:N, and per nom. Player has never played in a professional league, and while he was drafted by the Rangers (in the 6th round), he certainly does not play for them. Resolute 04:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Resolute. If he makes the NHL one day, then he can have an article. Kaiser matias (talk) 06:58, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete fails to meet WP:ATHLETE. -Djsasso (talk) 13:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: He fails WP:ATHLETE. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 13:21, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and remake if he makes it in the NHL --Banime (talk) 13:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Team Ontario is not a top-level amateur team, nor is the OHL a league sufficient for notability. —C.Fred (talk) 16:48, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails all notability standards, article can be recreated when he plays professionally. – Nurmsook!  talk...  21:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per all of above. I over-enthusiastically put a speedy tag on this yesterday, agree that notability is not yet proven. JNW (talk) 00:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.