Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitrade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:59, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Mitrade

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No credible claim to notability. All of the references included (and other sources I can find) are either reviews, primary sources, or obvious regurgitation of press releases. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORG particularly WP:ORGCRITE. Hugsyrup (talk) 16:06, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 17:11, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 17:11, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 17:11, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable secondary sources or assertion of notability. Even the included content is really scraping the barrel - Do we really need to know their trading license number? Yeti Hunter (talk) 21:24, 20 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Lacks notability and is mostly primarily sourced  Orville1974  (talk) 22:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:59, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Yet another spam article about an obscure fintech company. The article does not make a claim of notability, or provide any evidence that the firm might be notable. Nick-D (talk) 07:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.