Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitzi McGilvray (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:26, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Mitzi McGilvray
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable person. No further evidence for notability is the past three years. Previous discussion was more about inherited than inherent notability. Thompson Is Right (talk) 20:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment One of the two references mentions them, the other is old and off line and I couldn't check.  The external link to them at a game company is d4ead. North8000 (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: There is coverage out there about her  not included in the current article, though her positions don't strike me as a strong case for notability.  Software companies got much more of a pass in 2006.--Milowent • hasspoken  03:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Though there's not a lot of information about her in the article yet, there are definitely other sources. The fact that she was chair of the IGDA is sufficient to meet WP:BIO. She was, and is, an important figure in the game industry. --Elonka 04:04, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Notability is not inherited and IGDA is barely notable in itself. Given the failure to meet WP:GNG which get-out at WP:BIO do you rely on?  I fail to see one myself.  Thompson Is Right (talk) 12:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is the equivalent of posting a company's employee list as a Wikipedia article. Tom Reedy (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  02:54, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment: Last relisting for this debate.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  06:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete I'm finding plenty of information on her through searches, but none of them really count as reliable third party sources.  And even if the company she works for can be considered notable, there isn't anything I'm finding that would indicate that she, herself, has any independent notability.  Rorshacma (talk) 08:14, 24 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.