Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miwa Shoda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:49, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Miwa Shoda

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced and non-notable WP:BLP Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 22:37, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:01, 3 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. After finding nothing on English sites other than database entries or non-significant coverage, I checked Japanese sites using both 生田美和 and 生田美話, and all I could find beyond blog and database entries were these two articles at Famitsu.com: and . Both are just introductions to new games or novels, and don't really constitute significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Michitaro (talk) 21:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. No third-party sourcing or in-depth coverage to indicate a level of notability sufficient to justify a self-standing biographical article like this. --DAJF (talk) 01:51, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom, WP:NOTINHERITED. Sergecross73   msg me   15:16, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable.--Staberinde (talk) 19:57, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.