Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mizanur Rahman (cricket umpire)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deletion. —Cryptic 02:31, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Mizanur Rahman (cricket umpire)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCRIC.  Ts12rAc talk to me 16:28, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 18:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails the updated WP:NCRIC guidelines, and I'm not seeing anything in a search that would suggest a GNG pass (although this was only really an English language source). We don't really keep lists of umpires also, so not seeing a suitable WP:ATD either. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, although on the grounds that no suitable sources to show notability can be found. Failing NCRIC alone is not, in my view, a suitable rationale for deletion. It might indicate that deletion is an option and can be part of that rationale. If suitable non-English language sources can be found, then sure, I'd keep it. I doubt that'll be the case given the sorts of coverage we generally get of umpires who have not themselves played at the top level and are at his stage of career in the modern game. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:18, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. An example of why most umpires were removed from NCRIC – they do not generate the required significant coverage to pass GNG. wjematherplease leave a message... 11:30, 22 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.