Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mizna Waqas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  15:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Mizna Waqas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines WP:ACTOR and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Steps were taken to locate sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Saqib (talk) 05:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 10:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 10:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 10:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep as has prominent roles in national television series including Peek-A-Boo Shahwaiz, and Saaya (Geo TV), as well as recurring roles in many other series, passes WP:NACTOR with the prominent roles. thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 10:54, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The subject has had no major role in Saaya. Peek-A-Boo Shahwaiz is now up for deletion. --Saqib (talk) 13:43, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Nominated by yourself despite it being a nationally broadcast TV series passing WP:TVSERIES Atlantic306 (talk) 17:38, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Play Entertainment is not considered a national national TV station. --Saqib (talk) 17:56, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

*Keep being appeared in multiple television shows. Appeared in supporting role in acclaimed series Mera Naam Yousuf Hai and Suno Chanda for which her name is also mentioned in this, ,, and this. She only did supporting roles till mid of 2018 and if there are multiple roles then also passes requirement of wikipidea. From August 2018 she has appeared in a prominent role in Peek-A-Boo Shahwaiz which is currently airing, one can check episode title from official youtube page.. RidaJunejo.
 * Delete Being in a run of the mill show is pretty worthless in my opinion but the total lack of coverage is what sways me to say delete. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * And yet every single one of those is a passing mention. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


 * have you searched in Urdu for sources? Also images.dawn has the same editorial team as Dawn so it is a reliable source, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:14, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * And a buzzfeed like list with a single passing mention is irrelevant no matter who the editorial team is. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:48, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * it wasn't a list, it was a story about a tv series, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 17:15, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * And have you searched in Urdu sources for coverage ? I did and found nothing significant. Don't just insist there must be sources out there somewhere, prove it by providing them. And second thing, Dawn and Dawn Images have different editorial team, for your information. Dawn Images is more like a tabloid news site.--Saqib (talk) 17:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Dawn images is owned by Dawn and lists the same editorial team Atlantic306 (talk) 17:13, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Guess you need to meet Dawn Images team. --Saqib (talk) 17:23, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * It is owned by Dawn and Dawn appointed the staff Atlantic306 (talk) 17:38, 2 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per Atlantic306 - Their roles in notable TV programmes/Films would push them over the NACTOR threshold, Meets NACTOR & BASIC. – Davey 2010 Talk 21:15, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The subject has had no major role in multiple TV serials. --Saqib (talk) 13:58, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Further analysis of the substance of the sources, rather than their existence, would be helpful in determining consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (talk) 09:58, 22 August 2018 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 21:12, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin Absence of significant coverage as required by GNG, and none of the keep votes has put forward any policy based argument. --Saqib (talk) 07:07, 1 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete – current coverage is not enough to pass WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Much of them are name-checks only, fails WP:ANYBIO. Störm   (talk)  15:05, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Block evasion RidaJunejo is blocked for block evasion: (Sockpuppet investigations/Lillyput4455) so I suggest their comments be struck down. --Saqib (talk) 17:11, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment prominent roles does not mean only leading roles, being in the main cast of a national TV series counts as prominent and Waqas has been in the main cast of many TV Series so easily passes WP:NACTOR, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 17:38, 2 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per Chrissymad and Störm above. Minor roles in two major TV shows (according to reliable sources), lacks evidence of notability, therefore fails WP:NACTOR which requires significant roles in multiple productions. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS (talk |c|em ) 18:10, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * You are forgetting a starring role in a national TV series and only looking at the article's refs rather than searching for others Atlantic306 (talk) 18:49, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

This article was created and later expanded by the different socks of User:Pakistanpedia so it also falls under G5. --Saqib (talk) 21:33, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * This here is the original version of the article before it was slashed Atlantic306 (talk) 18:55, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Are you serious? who said I only looked at the current references? A Google News search yields only (only) 9 hits and all are name-checks also if you really care about which I slashed under WP:BURDEN why not to cite some reliable soruce and prove it? <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS  (talk |c|em ) 04:36, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * No, its had major edits by a number of editors including GSS Atlantic306 (talk) 18:58, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm fairly sure would disagree with you.  CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * 100 percent and my edits shouldn't be considered substantial in any way. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:hsl(205, 98%, 55%);">GSS (talk |c|em ) 15:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Impartial observer comment: GSS has not contributed to the article in any meaningful sense, he has merely performed maintenance tasks.  It appears the editors that have added meaningful content to this article are  and .  The article was created by Shariq554, who does not appear to be a blocked or banned editor.  AwaisRaza3000, a sock of Pakistanpedia, merely created a redirect.   78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 15:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * And was a sock of Pakistanpedia. --Saqib (talk) 15:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * You are correct, I didn't go deep enough into the SPI. I have corrected my earlier statement.  There have been three substantial editors, one of which was a sockpuppet, but the sockpuppet is not the article creator.   78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 16:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per . Has major roles in significant TV series. Passes WP:GNG WP:NACTOR at least. Knightrises10 (talk) 13:35, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * And how? care to explain to us? --Saqib (talk) 15:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions" Knightrises10 (talk) 15:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * And which are those? Did you read the comment that refutes that just below the nomination? CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:35, 7 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.