Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mizo Hlakungpui Mual


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 17:18, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Mizo Hlakungpui Mual

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Barely comprehensible, largely ungrammatical and severely unencyclopedic article about a non-notable monument apparently situated in a village in India (at least, that's what I figured out the article is meant to be about; it's difficult to ascertain.) No independent coverage, no indication of notability. No sourcing. Was created by new contributor with evident promotional interest in the topic, who also removed a PROD tag. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:03, 21 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Ah, but sources do not have to be in English, and articles must be verifiable (sources must exist out there) but not necessarily referenced. RS exist, see below. And we must take extreme care not to disadvantage those for whom English is not their first language. Poor writing is NOT cause for deletion (and an improper reason for coming to AfD); it merely requires tagging and editing. Chiswick Chap (talk) 22:22, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Sources:
 * Government of Mizoram press release on Silver Jubilee of Hlakungpui Mual, 6 April 2011, by K. Laldingliani Mis and Ipro Champai. --- this source is impeccably reliable and independent, and establishes beyond doubt the foundation, existence and jubilee of the site.


 * Hlakungpui Silver Jubilee Celebration Shows detailed planning for the event.


 * Video: Silver Jubilee of Mizo Poet's Square 6-7 April 2011. (Does not establish notability but shows event and the site. )


 * Keep. If knew nothing more than Future Perfect did when making this nomination, I would have agreed heartily, but I'm convinced by the governmental and other sources found by Chiswick Chap.  Nyttend (talk) 01:53, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.