Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mizuki Endo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:31, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Mizuki Endo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article (CV?) has languished for three years with no one willing or able to add any third-party sourcing. In the absence of any in-depth coverage or reliable sourcing, it is hard to see how this satisfies the basic notability criteria. An earlier PROD of the article was declined by an admin who suggested using the Japanese Wikipedia article to expand this article... the only problem being that the Japanese article has no additional content and is similarly unsourced. --DAJF (talk) 02:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. As the admin referenced, my main concern was that the subject has received an award which might constitute adequate notability. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. --DAJF (talk) 02:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * delete per nom 208.54.35.196 (talk) 21:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 08:24, 25 April 2013 (UTC)


 * strong delete probable WP:AUTOBIO. created by a single purpose editor. LibStar (talk) 08:40, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.