Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mladý muž a bílá velryba: Malý chemický epos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Consensus at Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive987 was not to procedurally close these AfDs en masse, however ill-considered they may have been, but to deal with them on a case-by-case basis. Following that logic, an AfD with this level of participation would usually be relisted. However, given the indiscriminate nature of the nominations, I don't think that would be productive. But if any editor is willing to do a proper WP:BEFORE and re-nominate this, they should feel free to do so. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 20:37, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Mladý muž a bílá velryba: Malý chemický epos

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NBOOK nor GNG. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  18:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 18:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 18:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Procedural Keep - Bad faith nomination, one of three made in a single minute. WP:BEFORE is being flouted and (semi-)automation abused. Carrite (talk) 13:57, 22 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep as per Carrite. These 150-plus bot-tool generated AfDs have zero regard to WP:BEFORE.--Oakshade (talk) 01:00, 28 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.