Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mladen Stanisic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Mladen Stanisic

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Promotion, possible hoax. Previously deleted article created by SPA w/o much of a believable claim to notability. Gnews returns nothing on Stanisic or his "eco-club"; the refs used are rather dubious - Djecji klub magazine doesn't appear to exist (at least after my own search), the Boomerang mag ad looks like a gag, and a Twitter account of course doesn't meet WP:RS. The article offers nothing outside the lead on his acting/singing.  Mbinebri  talk &larr; 19:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Both Boomerang and Djecji klub exist!!! http://www.yu4you.com/items/en/casopis/item_190.html - Boomerang found on online shopping sites http://www.modriani.co.yu/sr/klijenti.html - Boomerang is published by Luxor http://ultratv.rs/ - Photo advertisement for Boomerang on the website of the leading kids TV station in Serbia You searched for "Boomerang magazine" instead of "casopis Boomerang" which is on the Serbian language! http://jutarnjiklub.com/artikl/203 - Djecji klub magazine (casopis Djecji klub on Croatian) available in online shopping stores http://online.konzum.hr/categories/5471896/products/50016202 - Another online shop selling Djecji klub http://www.eph.hr/eng/products_and_services/index.html - Djecji klub listed as a publication of EPH (EuropaPressHolding) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europapress_Holding - Wikipedia article on the publisher of Djecji klub http://pravonarazvoj.crolink.net/ - Djecji klub said to be an important magazine for kids' mental growth http://www.kgz.hr/gradska/djecji/casopisi.asp - Djecji klub available in libraries THOSE ARE 9 PROOFS! DO YOU NEED MORE?!? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.189.218.213 (talk) 07:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete- per Nomination. I was considering to nominate it too. Total self promotion. Hitro   talk  19:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as either hoax or non-notable. Drawn Some (talk) 01:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:57, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment- I still stand by my vote. Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable secondary sources. The links above may verify the existence of the sources but I do not think it verifies notability of the subject. Hitro   talk  18:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.