Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mllat Mohammed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Mllat Mohammed

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Declined at AFC three times but moved to main space by creator, fails WP:GNG and WP:NWRITER poorly sourced with blogs and primary sources. Theroadislong (talk) 18:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 18:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Iraq.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  18:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: No coverage found for this writer, sources used now in the article are red, so non-RS. Declined 3x at AFC is a bad sign, not notable. Oaktree b (talk) 00:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. Articles for Creation is pretty spotty when dealing with non-Anglophone subjects, especially academic/literary subjects; also it's only been declined once by a reviewer other than the current nominator. Can't read the sources but there appear to be several book reviews already in the article -- could someone who can read them please comment? Also on the articles on two other 'pedias. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: BLP, I removed the unsourced material from the article (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mllat_Mohammed&diff=prev&oldid=1185388391 link to original version with unsourced material). Fails GNG and NBIO. From looking at the titles of the sources, they are about their works, not about the author and very little of the information about the author is sourced. BLPs require strong sourcing and I don't see WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. If sources are found with SIGCOV, ping me.  // Timothy :: talk  12:31, 18 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.