Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moana 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow keep/nomination withdrawn. JDDJS ( talk to me  •  see what I've done ) 05:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Moana 2

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Upcoming film. Coverage is mostly based on in-passing mentions and press releases. Seems like WP:TOOSOON, but it will likely be notable within a few months (scheduled for November). Draftify until then? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Comics and animation,  and United States of America. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  02:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep They already released the teaser trailer. That's more than far enough in production for an article. JDDJS  ( talk to me  •  see what I've done ) 03:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: According to the teaser, final animation has begun. LancedSoul (talk) 05:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep – A teaser trailer has been released and final animation has begun; the film has had more than enough coverage to warrant an article. – Treetoes023 (talk) 12:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Would you consider withdrawing the nomination in light of the first !votes expressed? It would very likely save some time. Thanks.- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  13:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC) (Also please see the page, I've just added a few sources (BBC, Guardian, Variety and I could have added a lot more).
 * @Mushy Yank Sure. Withdrawing. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 23:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks! - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  23:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. The OP is incorrect. I can understand if this was some obscure film, but there has been A LOT of talk about this recently, especially with the announcement that this was moving from a TV series to a film. I would say it is already notable now. I have to agree with the other comments on here. The fact that this is an upcoming film does not disqualify it from being notable.Historyday01 (talk) 14:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. A trailer has been released and its a Disney film, that's more than enough for the article to exist. GhaziTwaissi (talk) 14:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: As per the teaser, the final stages of animation have commenced.
 * Kitrsjlhf (talk) 16:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep per above. Plenty of relevant coverage since the teaser was released a couple days ago. -- Zoo  Blazer  17:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is not a one-sentence article and although the article is short, there is still enough sourced information that there are no obstacles to retaining it. OGPawlis (talk) 19:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * STRONG Keep: Are you kidding? The movie has been in production for years as a television series, before it is not repurposed as a feature film. The release is this year, and the teaser trailer has been released.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 21:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


 * EXTREME Keep. It is not WP:TOOSOON and should be kept. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 22:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: Please note that Piotrus has kindly withdrawn this nomination. If anyone has time to close this as speedy keep, thanks!- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  23:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.